Back to Insights

Before You Add More Salespeople, Fix Your Sales Strategy

Earl Wells

Why increasing sales headcount isn't always the best way to accelerate revenue growth.

When revenue growth slows, one of the first solutions companies consider is hiring more salespeople.

The logic seems reasonable. More salespeople should mean more customer conversations, more opportunities, and ultimately more revenue.

And sometimes that's exactly what a company needs.

But adding headcount to an inefficient sales strategy can be an expensive way to produce disappointing results.

Before expanding the sales organization, leadership should examine whether the existing team is operating within the most effective sales model. Are sales resources focused on the right customers? Are territories properly aligned with market opportunities? Is the company using the right combination of direct and indirect sales channels?

And perhaps most importantly, is the company maximizing the revenue potential of the sales resources it already has access to, including those outside its own organization?

For many technology companies, the opportunity to accelerate growth may not require hiring more employees. It may require rethinking how the company reaches its customers.

1. More Salespeople Don't Automatically Mean More Sales

Consider a technology company with 20 direct sales representatives.

Revenue growth has slowed, and leadership determines that increasing the sales organization by 25% should generate a corresponding increase in sales activity.

Five additional representatives are hired.

But what if the original 20 representatives were already struggling with poorly designed territories, inadequate lead generation, inefficient sales processes, or insufficient customer coverage?

Adding five more people doesn't solve those problems.

It simply distributes the same inefficiencies across a larger organization.

And the financial commitment extends well beyond base salaries.

Every additional salesperson brings compensation expenses, payroll taxes, benefits, sales tools, training requirements, management overhead, and time before becoming fully productive.

Depending on the complexity of the product and sales cycle, a new representative may require several months before generating meaningful revenue.

Hiring additional salespeople makes sense when the existing sales model is working and the organization needs more capacity. It makes considerably less sense when the model itself is limiting performance.

The first question leadership should ask isn't how many additional salespeople are needed.

It's whether the current sales strategy is producing the best possible return from the resources already available.

2. Are Your Salespeople Focused on the Right Customers?

Not every customer requires the same sales approach.

Large enterprise accounts often justify dedicated account managers who can develop long-term relationships, navigate complex purchasing processes, and coordinate multiple products and services.

Government accounts may require specialized salespeople familiar with procurement regulations, contracting vehicles, and public-sector purchasing requirements.

These customers frequently benefit from direct engagement with the manufacturer or service provider.

But what about the thousands of small and midsize businesses that also represent potential customers?

Assigning dedicated direct salespeople to pursue every opportunity may not be the most efficient approach.

A direct salesperson pursuing a relatively small transaction still requires a salary, benefits, management support, and the operational infrastructure of the sales organization.

In many cases, these customers already maintain relationships with resellers, technology advisors, managed service providers, or other trusted technology partners.

Those partners may be better positioned to reach and serve these customers than a manufacturer attempting to build a large direct sales organization.

This is where customer segmentation becomes particularly important.

The objective shouldn't be to have your own salesperson reach every potential customer. It should be to establish the most effective and economical route to each customer segment.

For many organizations, that means maintaining direct sales coverage for strategic accounts while developing indirect channels to expand reach across the broader market.

3. Your Next Sales Team May Not Need to Be on Your Payroll

One of the most significant growth opportunities for technology companies is the ability to leverage established indirect sales ecosystems.

Distributors, value-added resellers, managed service providers, technology advisors, and agents collectively represent a substantial sales resource that companies can access without building an equivalent internal sales organization.

Consider the difference between hiring ten additional direct sales representatives and establishing relationships with channel partners that already employ hundreds or thousands of customer-facing salespeople.

The potential reach is dramatically different.

Of course, those partner salespeople represent multiple manufacturers and service providers. They aren't dedicated exclusively to your products.

But that's precisely why a well-designed channel strategy can be so powerful.

Instead of building every customer relationship from scratch, a company can work through partners that already have established relationships, industry expertise, and customer trust.

The economics can also be attractive.

Direct sales organizations carry significant fixed costs regardless of whether sales targets are achieved.

Indirect sales models typically shift a larger portion of selling costs toward transaction-based margins or commissions, although channel development, enablement, incentives, and management still require investment.

The opportunity isn't simply to reduce sales costs. It's to expand market coverage beyond what the company could reasonably achieve through direct sales hiring alone.

However, creating a successful indirect channel requires considerably more than signing a few reseller or agent agreements.

4. Are You Taking Full Advantage of Your Distributors and TSDs?

Many technology companies already have relationships with national distributors or Technology Services Distributors (TSDs).

They may have products listed in distributor catalogs, established reseller pricing, or agreements allowing agents and technology advisors to represent their offerings.

But having access to a distribution network and actively using that network to generate demand are two very different things.

Major technology distributors and TSDs often offer programs designed to help suppliers increase partner engagement and sales activity.

Depending on the organization, these may include partner recruitment initiatives, sales training, marketing campaigns, demand generation, incentive programs, financing solutions, and access to established reseller or agent communities.

Some also provide dedicated business development resources or opportunities to participate in partner events and targeted sales campaigns.

The question is whether your company is actively taking advantage of those resources.

Too often, companies establish distribution agreements, upload product information, conduct an initial training session, and wait for orders to arrive.

Then, when channel revenue fails to meet expectations, leadership concludes that the indirect model isn't working.

But the problem may not be the channel.

The problem may be that the company never fully activated it.

A distributor or TSD relationship should be viewed as a platform for developing sales activity, not simply a mechanism for processing transactions.

That means understanding the programs available, identifying which ones align with your growth objectives, and building a coordinated plan to put those resources to work.

Before investing in additional internal sales headcount, consider whether you're fully utilizing the external sales infrastructure you've already established.

5. Don't Just Recruit Channel Partners. Teach Them How to Make Money Selling Your Product.

One of the most common mistakes companies make when developing an indirect channel is assuming that signing partners will automatically produce sales.

It rarely works that way.

Resellers and agents have numerous products and services available to represent. Their salespeople naturally concentrate on offerings they understand, feel comfortable presenting, and believe they can successfully sell.

A new supplier entering the channel is competing for something extremely valuable: the attention and selling time of independent salespeople.

Simply providing product specifications, pricing sheets, and an online training course isn't always enough.

Partners need to understand who the ideal customer is, what business problems the product solves, how to position it against alternatives, and how to move an opportunity through the sales process.

They also need confidence that their efforts will be rewarded.

This is where effective channel enablement becomes critical.

Strong enablement programs should include practical sales training, competitive positioning, customer qualification guidance, sales tools, technical resources, and responsive support.

But there's another element that companies frequently overlook.

Sometimes the best way to teach a partner how to sell your product is to help them close their first few deals.

6. Prime the Channel With Real Opportunities

Imagine recruiting a new reseller to represent your product.

You provide training, pricing information, marketing materials, and access to a partner portal.

Then you tell the reseller to start selling.

The reseller's salespeople now have to identify potential customers, introduce an unfamiliar product, overcome objections, and develop enough confidence to recommend it.

Meanwhile, they have established products from other suppliers that they already know how to sell.

Which products are likely to receive their attention?

Now consider a different approach.

Instead of expecting the partner to develop every opportunity independently, your company provides several qualified leads or invites the partner to participate in active sales opportunities.

Your sales team works alongside the partner, helping with customer discovery, product demonstrations, proposals, and closing the transaction.

The partner gains practical experience selling the product.

More importantly, the partner begins generating revenue and earning commissions or margins.

That early success can fundamentally change how the partner views the relationship.

The product is no longer simply another offering in the catalog. It's something the partner understands, has successfully sold, and knows can generate income.

Those first transactions also create an opportunity to build relationships between your salespeople and the partner's sales organization.

Over time, the partner becomes more confident developing opportunities independently.

Early pipeline support shouldn't be viewed simply as giving business away. It can be an investment in building a productive, self-sustaining sales channel.

This approach requires discipline. Lead ownership, customer relationships, partner responsibilities, and compensation must be clearly defined.

The goal is to help partners become productive, not create permanent dependence on manufacturer-generated leads.

But when executed properly, early co-selling and pipeline development can accelerate the transition from a newly recruited partner to an actively selling partner.

7. Make Sure Your Direct Sales Team Supports the Channel

Even companies with established indirect sales programs can unintentionally undermine their success through poorly aligned internal sales structures.

Consider a company that wants to increase reseller participation but compensates its direct salespeople more favorably when they close transactions directly.

A salesperson identifies an opportunity that could be fulfilled through a reseller.

But routing the transaction through the channel reduces the salesperson's commission or creates uncertainty about account ownership.

The salesperson now has a financial reason to avoid the channel, even when the reseller might be better positioned to serve the customer.

This creates a conflict between the company's growth strategy and the individual salesperson's compensation.

A properly designed sales organization should establish clear rules governing direct and indirect opportunities.

Account ownership, deal registration, commission credit, partner involvement, and customer responsibilities should all support the intended sales model.

In many situations, direct salespeople should be encouraged to introduce channel partners into appropriate opportunities.

The direct team can help develop demand, support complex sales discussions, and maintain strategic customer relationships while the channel expands the company's ability to transact, deploy, and support solutions.

Your direct and indirect sales teams shouldn't be competing for the same revenue. They should be working together to capture more of the market.

8. Optimize the Sales Model Before Expanding the Sales Organization

None of this suggests that companies should stop hiring salespeople.

Direct sales teams remain essential, particularly for strategic accounts, complex enterprise opportunities, major customer relationships, and specialized markets.

And successful indirect channels require internal resources for partner management, enablement, business development, and operational support.

The objective is to determine where additional investment will produce the greatest return.

Before approving a significant increase in sales headcount, leadership should evaluate several questions:

  • Are our existing salespeople focused on the customer segments where direct engagement creates the greatest value?
  • Could resellers, agents, or technology advisors serve portions of our market more effectively?
  • Are we fully utilizing the programs and sales resources available through our distributors and TSDs?
  • Have we given our channel partners the training, tools, and support they need to sell successfully?
  • Are we helping new partners generate early revenue through qualified leads and joint selling?
  • Do our compensation plans encourage cooperation between direct and indirect sales teams?
  • Would additional investment in channel development generate greater market coverage than adding more direct salespeople?

The answers may reveal that the company doesn't necessarily need a larger sales organization.

It needs a more effective sales strategy.

The Bottom Line

When revenue growth disappoints, hiring additional salespeople can feel like the most direct solution.

More people should create more activity. More activity should produce more opportunities. More opportunities should generate more revenue.

But that equation only works when the underlying sales strategy is sound.

For many technology companies, significant growth opportunities already exist within their current organization and established partner relationships.

The challenge is identifying those opportunities and putting the right structure, resources, and incentives in place to capture them.

That might mean redesigning territories, improving account segmentation, strengthening distributor relationships, activating underutilized TSD programs, or investing in channel enablement and early partner pipeline development.

It may also mean adding salespeople—but adding them in roles that expand the productivity of an entire partner ecosystem rather than simply increasing direct account coverage.

Before you invest in more salespeople, make sure you're getting the full potential from your sales strategy.

Because sometimes the fastest way to grow your sales organization isn't to hire more people.

It's to get more people selling for you.